From 9084709b720b49d68a816349a601d1095876f94e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yomna Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 22:05:44 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Clarify SRBs in cellular transparency HAL Bugs: b/283336425 Test: N/A Flags: EXEMPT bugfix Change-Id: Id4203269dd0fc9d596e18a197af806de2a3898a9 --- .../android/hardware/radio/network/IRadioNetworkIndication.aidl | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/radio/aidl/android/hardware/radio/network/IRadioNetworkIndication.aidl b/radio/aidl/android/hardware/radio/network/IRadioNetworkIndication.aidl index 34948fb863..7b6fc6e403 100644 --- a/radio/aidl/android/hardware/radio/network/IRadioNetworkIndication.aidl +++ b/radio/aidl/android/hardware/radio/network/IRadioNetworkIndication.aidl @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ oneway interface IRadioNetworkIndication { * operation, it becomes complicated when integrity is used to determine whether an * emergency call is protected or not, hence its exclusion to simplify implementation. * - 4G and 5G with multiple DRBs : emergency calls are protected under that RAT only if all - * DRBs are protected (including IMS DRB). + * SRBs and DRBs are protected (including IMS DRB). * - 4G and 5G DRB integrity: Since DRB integrity is not enabled in most networks, if both * ciphering and integrity are taken into account to determine the value of * isUnprotectedEmergency, the value will mostly be false, hence why it is excluded.