Merge "Amend tests on GSI that rely on RKP-only props" into main am: 550caafbfd am: c5be81626d

Original change: https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/hardware/interfaces/+/3168999

Change-Id: I62810c5b23d32187ece5076dabaefb4354240992
Signed-off-by: Automerger Merge Worker <android-build-automerger-merge-worker@system.gserviceaccount.com>
This commit is contained in:
Karuna Wadhera
2024-07-17 15:07:13 +00:00
committed by Automerger Merge Worker
3 changed files with 33 additions and 24 deletions

View File

@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ bool IsSelfSigned(const vector<Certificate>& chain) {
class AttestKeyTest : public KeyMintAidlTestBase {
public:
void SetUp() override {
skipAttestKeyTestIfNeeded();
if (shouldSkipAttestKeyTest()) {
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test using ATTEST_KEY is not applicable on waivered device";
}
KeyMintAidlTestBase::SetUp();
}
};
@@ -251,7 +253,11 @@ TEST_P(AttestKeyTest, RsaAttestedAttestKeys) {
.SetDefaultValidity(),
{} /* attestation signing key */, &attest_key.keyBlob,
&attest_key_characteristics, &attest_key_cert_chain);
if (isRkpOnly() && result == ErrorCode::ATTESTATION_KEYS_NOT_PROVISIONED) {
std::optional<bool> rkpOnly = isRkpOnly();
if (!rkpOnly.has_value()) {
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test not applicable because RKP-only status cannot be determined";
}
if (rkpOnly.value() && result == ErrorCode::ATTESTATION_KEYS_NOT_PROVISIONED) {
GTEST_SKIP() << "RKP-only devices do not have a factory key";
}
ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, result);
@@ -355,7 +361,8 @@ TEST_P(AttestKeyTest, RsaAttestKeyChaining) {
.Authorization(TAG_CERTIFICATE_SUBJECT, subject_der)
.SetDefaultValidity();
// In RKP-only systems, the first key cannot be attested due to lack of batch key
if (!isRkpOnly() || i > 0) {
bool confirmedNotRkpOnly = !isRkpOnly().value_or(true);
if (confirmedNotRkpOnly || i > 0) {
auth_set_builder.AttestationChallenge("foo");
}
auto result = GenerateAttestKey(auth_set_builder, attest_key_opt, &key_blob_list[i],
@@ -363,7 +370,7 @@ TEST_P(AttestKeyTest, RsaAttestKeyChaining) {
ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, result);
deleters.push_back(KeyBlobDeleter(keymint_, key_blob_list[i]));
if (!isRkpOnly() || i > 0) {
if (confirmedNotRkpOnly || i > 0) {
AuthorizationSet hw_enforced = HwEnforcedAuthorizations(attested_key_characteristics);
AuthorizationSet sw_enforced = SwEnforcedAuthorizations(attested_key_characteristics);
ASSERT_GT(cert_chain_list[i].size(), 0);
@@ -386,7 +393,7 @@ TEST_P(AttestKeyTest, RsaAttestKeyChaining) {
}
EXPECT_TRUE(ChainSignaturesAreValid(cert_chain_list[i]));
EXPECT_GT(cert_chain_list[i].size(), i + (isRkpOnly() ? 0 : 1));
EXPECT_GT(cert_chain_list[i].size(), i + (confirmedNotRkpOnly ? 1 : 0));
verify_subject_and_serial(cert_chain_list[i][0], serial_int, subject, false);
}
}
@@ -432,7 +439,8 @@ TEST_P(AttestKeyTest, EcAttestKeyChaining) {
.Authorization(TAG_NO_AUTH_REQUIRED)
.SetDefaultValidity();
// In RKP-only systems, the first key cannot be attested due to lack of batch key
if (!isRkpOnly() || i > 0) {
bool confirmedNotRkpOnly = !isRkpOnly().value_or(true);
if (confirmedNotRkpOnly || i > 0) {
auth_set_builder.AttestationChallenge("foo");
}
auto result = GenerateAttestKey(auth_set_builder, attest_key_opt, &key_blob_list[i],
@@ -440,7 +448,7 @@ TEST_P(AttestKeyTest, EcAttestKeyChaining) {
ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, result);
deleters.push_back(KeyBlobDeleter(keymint_, key_blob_list[i]));
if (!isRkpOnly() || i > 0) {
if (confirmedNotRkpOnly || i > 0) {
AuthorizationSet hw_enforced = HwEnforcedAuthorizations(attested_key_characteristics);
AuthorizationSet sw_enforced = SwEnforcedAuthorizations(attested_key_characteristics);
ASSERT_GT(cert_chain_list[i].size(), 0);
@@ -459,7 +467,7 @@ TEST_P(AttestKeyTest, EcAttestKeyChaining) {
}
EXPECT_TRUE(ChainSignaturesAreValid(cert_chain_list[i]));
EXPECT_GT(cert_chain_list[i].size(), i + (isRkpOnly() ? 0 : 1));
EXPECT_GT(cert_chain_list[i].size(), i + (confirmedNotRkpOnly ? 1 : 0));
verify_subject_and_serial(cert_chain_list[i][0], serial_int, subject, false);
}
}
@@ -530,7 +538,8 @@ TEST_P(AttestKeyTest, AlternateAttestKeyChaining) {
.Authorization(TAG_NO_AUTH_REQUIRED)
.SetDefaultValidity();
// In RKP-only systems, the first key cannot be attested due to lack of batch key
if (!isRkpOnly() || i > 0) {
bool confirmedNotRkpOnly = !isRkpOnly().value_or(true);
if (confirmedNotRkpOnly || i > 0) {
auth_set_builder.AttestationChallenge("foo");
}
if ((i & 0x1) == 1) {
@@ -543,7 +552,7 @@ TEST_P(AttestKeyTest, AlternateAttestKeyChaining) {
ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, result);
deleters.push_back(KeyBlobDeleter(keymint_, key_blob_list[i]));
if (!isRkpOnly() || i > 0) {
if (confirmedNotRkpOnly || i > 0) {
AuthorizationSet hw_enforced = HwEnforcedAuthorizations(attested_key_characteristics);
AuthorizationSet sw_enforced = SwEnforcedAuthorizations(attested_key_characteristics);
ASSERT_GT(cert_chain_list[i].size(), 0);
@@ -566,7 +575,7 @@ TEST_P(AttestKeyTest, AlternateAttestKeyChaining) {
}
EXPECT_TRUE(ChainSignaturesAreValid(cert_chain_list[i]));
EXPECT_GT(cert_chain_list[i].size(), i + (isRkpOnly() ? 0 : 1));
EXPECT_GT(cert_chain_list[i].size(), i + (confirmedNotRkpOnly ? 1 : 0));
verify_subject_and_serial(cert_chain_list[i][0], serial_int, subject, false);
}
}

View File

@@ -250,7 +250,13 @@ bool KeyMintAidlTestBase::isSecondImeiIdAttestationRequired() {
return AidlVersion() >= 3 && property_get_int32("ro.vendor.api_level", 0) > __ANDROID_API_T__;
}
bool KeyMintAidlTestBase::isRkpOnly() {
std::optional<bool> KeyMintAidlTestBase::isRkpOnly() {
// GSI replaces the values for remote_prov_prop properties (since theyre system_internal_prop
// properties), so on GSI the properties are not reliable indicators of whether StrongBox/TEE is
// RKP-only or not.
if (is_gsi_image()) {
return std::nullopt;
}
if (SecLevel() == SecurityLevel::STRONGBOX) {
return property_get_bool("remote_provisioning.strongbox.rkp_only", false);
}
@@ -318,8 +324,11 @@ ErrorCode KeyMintAidlTestBase::GenerateKey(const AuthorizationSet& key_desc,
vector<Certificate> attest_cert_chain;
// If an attestation is requested, but the system is RKP-only, we need to supply an explicit
// attestation key. Else the result is a key without an attestation.
if (isRkpOnly() && key_desc.Contains(TAG_ATTESTATION_CHALLENGE)) {
skipAttestKeyTestIfNeeded();
// If the RKP-only value is undeterminable (i.e., when running on GSI), generate and use the
// attest key anyways. In the case that using an attest key is not supported
// (shouldSkipAttestKeyTest), assume the device has factory keys (so not RKP-only).
if (isRkpOnly().value_or(true) && key_desc.Contains(TAG_ATTESTATION_CHALLENGE) &&
!shouldSkipAttestKeyTest()) {
AuthorizationSet attest_key_desc =
AuthorizationSetBuilder().EcdsaKey(EcCurve::P_256).AttestKey().SetDefaultValidity();
attest_key.emplace();
@@ -1677,14 +1686,6 @@ bool KeyMintAidlTestBase::shouldSkipAttestKeyTest(void) const {
is_attest_key_feature_disabled());
}
// Skip a test that involves use of the ATTEST_KEY feature in specific configurations
// where ATTEST_KEY is not supported (for either StrongBox or TEE).
void KeyMintAidlTestBase::skipAttestKeyTestIfNeeded() const {
if (shouldSkipAttestKeyTest()) {
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test using ATTEST_KEY is not applicable on waivered device";
}
}
void verify_serial(X509* cert, const uint64_t expected_serial) {
BIGNUM_Ptr ser(BN_new());
EXPECT_TRUE(ASN1_INTEGER_to_BN(X509_get_serialNumber(cert), ser.get()));

View File

@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ class KeyMintAidlTestBase : public ::testing::TestWithParam<string> {
uint32_t boot_patch_level();
bool isDeviceIdAttestationRequired();
bool isSecondImeiIdAttestationRequired();
bool isRkpOnly();
std::optional<bool> isRkpOnly();
bool Curve25519Supported();
@@ -356,7 +356,6 @@ class KeyMintAidlTestBase : public ::testing::TestWithParam<string> {
bool is_strongbox_enabled(void) const;
bool is_chipset_allowed_km4_strongbox(void) const;
bool shouldSkipAttestKeyTest(void) const;
void skipAttestKeyTestIfNeeded() const;
void assert_mgf_digests_present_or_not_in_key_characteristics(
const vector<KeyCharacteristics>& key_characteristics,